Core IM
Cardiorenal syndrome (CRS) is becoming increasingly recognized with the growing number of patients with concomitant congestive heart failure and chronic kidney disease. Management of these patients both in the inpatient and outpatient settings is challenging especially as the evidence base continues to expand rapidly. This episode aims to review more recent evidence and developments in the understanding of cardiorenal syndrome, inpatient diuretic management, and use of cardio- and renoprotective medical therapies in heart failure patients with chronic kidney disease.
On this Core IM episode, learners will better understand the differences in characteristics between loop diuretics, how to properly assess diuretic response in patients admitted with decompensated heart failure, when to use adjunctive agents including thiazides and acetazolamide, and the appropriate use of renoprotective and guideline-directed medical therapy in later stages of chronic kidney disease. You’re invited to join the team as they discuss, Cardiorenal Considerations: 5 Pearls Segment.
First, . After listening, ACP members can for free.
CME/MOC:
Up to 0.5
AMA PRA Category 1 Credits ™ and MOC Points
Expires May 12, 2027
active
Cost:
Free to Members
Format:
Podcasts and Audio Content
Product:
Core IM
Welcome to Core IM, a virtual medical community! Core IM strives to empower its colleagues of all levels and backgrounds with clinically applicable information as well as inspire curiosity and critical thinking. Core IM promotes its mission through podcasts and other multimodal dialogues. ACP has teamed up with Core IM to offer continuing medical education, available exclusively to ACP members by completing the CME/MOC quiz.
Pearl 1: Make sure the renal dysfunction is actually all cardiorenal!
• How do you define cardiorenal physiology?
- Classic Definition:
- Kidney dysfunction that is related to either a (1) low-flow state and/or (2) renal venous congestion
- BOTH can independently lead to decreased intrarenal blood flow
- BOTH can lead to neurohormonal activation → Increased renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) activity
- Can be detrimental to renal function!
- NOTE: Renal venous congestion is thought to be a larger contributor to kidney dysfunction than low-flow states
- Kidney dysfunction that is related to either a (1) low-flow state and/or (2) renal venous congestion
• How should you think about the differential for a kidney injury in someone with heart failure?
- Be broad! Multiple processes can happen at the same time
- Urinalysis findings:
- Pure cardiorenal syndrome
- “Bland” with no protein, blood, granular or other cell casts
- May have hyaline casts
- No signs of intrinsic injury!
- “Bland” with no protein, blood, granular or other cell casts
- NOTE: Screen for proteinuria in heart failure patients!
- Urine protein to creatinine ratio (UPCR) or
- Urine albumin to creatinine ratio (UACR)
- Pure cardiorenal syndrome
- on a urine dipstick!
- Urinalysis findings:
Pearl 2: Practical Tidbits on Loop Diuretics
- What is the “go-to” loop diuretic for someone who is hospitalized for volume overload?
- Intravenous therapy!
- Because gut edema may interfere with oral absorption
- Dosing:
-
- Benefits of this dosing:
-
- By
- Faster transition back to oral diuretics
- Compared to lower IV doses
-
- Benefits of this dosing:
- Continuous vs. Bolus dosing?
- !
- NOTE: Patients being treated with bolus may require more escalations in dosing during their hospitalization
- !
-
- Intravenous therapy!
- What are the differences between loop diuretics?
- IV formulations:
- Furosemide vs. Bumetanide
- No difference in outcomes demonstrated
- But not largely studied!
- Bumetanide Considerations:
- More potent
- Practitioners may be more comfortable with using higher equivalent doses since bumetanide doses are in the single digits
- with IV bumetanide as a continuous infusion
- Especially with higher doses
- Unclear if unique to bumetanide or if purely dose-related given furosemide is not typically used at equally high equivalent doses
- More potent
- No difference in outcomes demonstrated
- Furosemide vs. Bumetanide
- PO formulations:
- Furosemide vs. Torsemide vs. Bumetanide
- Conversions (PO): Furosemide 40 mg = torsemide 20 mg = bumetanide 1 mg
- Considerations when choosing PO:
- Bioavailability
- Furosemide
- Torsemide & Bumetanide
- Furosemide
- Duration of action
-
- NOTE:
- Torsemide can be dosed once daily, whereas
- Bumetanide should be dosed at least twice daily!
- NOTE:
-
- Bioavailability
- Torsemide is preferred over furosemide since it is more predictable!
- Caveat: The did not show significant difference in outcomes between torsemide and furosemide
- However, there are many criticisms of the trial!
- Significant crossover
- Use of mortality as the primary outcome rather than other metrics
- However, there are many criticisms of the trial!
- Caveat: The did not show significant difference in outcomes between torsemide and furosemide
- Furosemide vs. Torsemide vs. Bumetanide
- IV formulations:
Pearl 3: Assessing Diuretic Response and Renal Function
- How to assess diuretic response?
- Traditionally assessment:
- Weights
- Exam findings
- Urine output
- Challenges with relying on these:
- D
- In case of inadequate response
- D
- Alternative assessment:
- Spot urine sodium (UNa) level
- Measures diuretic responsiveness
- Quick assessment 1-2 hours after administering loop diuretic
- Interpretation:
- to the current dose of loop diuretic
- GOAL: >70 mEq/L
- For an appropriate response
- Causes of falsely high spot UNa:
- Low volume of urine
- Metabolic alkalosis
- Medications (ex. piperacillin-tazobactam)
- Causes of falsely low spot UNa:
- Cirrhosis
- High volume of urine
- NOTE: Using a spot to escalate loop diuretic dosing was feasible
- Resulted in:
- !
- Resulted in:
- Spot urine sodium (UNa) level
- Traditionally assessment:
- What do you do if the response to diuretic is not adequate?
- Start a drip (if at maximum dose)
- Reassess initial diagnosis or if new insult!
- What happens to creatinine during diuresis?
- Generally safe to see up to 30% rise in from baseline levels with active decongesion
- Known as “or”worsening renal function” (WRF) (https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.030112?url_ver=Z39.88-2003&rfr_id=ori:rid:crossref.org&rfr_dat=cr_pub 0pubmed)
- Usually does NOT reflect true renal tubular injury (https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.030112?url_ver=Z39.88-2003&rfr_id=ori:rid:crossref.org&rfr_dat=cr_pub 0pubmed)
- Even though this threshold is how acute kidney injury (AKI) is defined
- Rise is a result of:
- Hemodynamic or functional change in glomerular filtration
- Hemoconcentration of creatinine (https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.111.963413?url_ver=Z39.88-2003&rfr_id=ori:rid:crossref.org&rfr_dat=cr_pub 0pubmed)
- In patients who are being adequately decongested (https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.111.963413?url_ver=Z39.88-2003&rfr_id=ori:rid:crossref.org&rfr_dat=cr_pub 0pubmed)!
- Alone, should NOT be a reason to stop diuresing a volume overload patient
- NOTE: Mortality compared to those who had “worsening” levels.
- The rise has no predictive value for rehospitalization or mortality (https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.111.963413?url_ver=Z39.88-2003&rfr_id=ori:rid:crossref.org&rfr_dat=cr_pub 0pubmed) unless patients also had other signs of congestion at discharge
- Usually does NOT reflect true renal tubular injury (https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.030112?url_ver=Z39.88-2003&rfr_id=ori:rid:crossref.org&rfr_dat=cr_pub 0pubmed)
- Still, always still do the due diligence each day!
- Volume assessment
- Urine output monitoring
- Consider need to evaluate for another cause of rising serum creatinine
- Consider more sophisticated and/or invasive measures of volume status
- Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS)
- Right heart catheterization
- Known as “or”worsening renal function” (WRF) (https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.030112?url_ver=Z39.88-2003&rfr_id=ori:rid:crossref.org&rfr_dat=cr_pub 0pubmed)
- Generally safe to see up to 30% rise in from baseline levels with active decongesion
Pearl 4: How to approach diuretic resistance
- What is diuretic resistance?
- despite using appropriate or escalating doses of diuretics.
- Consider…Is something else going on?
- Diuretics cannot work if they are not reaching the kidney!
- Some factors to consider:
- Shock
- Low-flow state
- Elevated intra-abdominal pressure (ascites)
- How can you augment your diuresis?
- Sequential nephron blockade!
- Thiazide or Thiazide-Like Diuretics:
- PO Metolazone vs. IVChlorothiazide (or Diuril)
- Metolazone
- Less expensive
- Metolazone has a compared to chlorothiazide
- Chlorothiazide
- More expensive (cost is starting to come down)
- NOTE: Many clinicians anecdotally prefer chlorothiazide because of faster onset and IV administration
- Effect:
- in terms of urine output measured at 24-48 hours.
- Metolazone
- Alternative adjusts:
- Hydrochlorothiazide or Chlorthalidone
- Reasonable options though more in outpatient setting
- Commonly used as antihypertensives
- Reasonable options though more in outpatient setting
- Acetazolamide
- Achieves
- Without any differences in safety outcomes!
- In practice: Considered especially in cases of worsening metabolic alkalosis or in COPD
- Caution when using serum bicarbonate is low!
- Achieves
- Acute SGLT2i
- Not well-established adjunct
- Hypertonic saline
- Not well-established adjunct
- Hydrochlorothiazide or Chlorthalidone
- PO Metolazone vs. IVChlorothiazide (or Diuril)
- Thiazide or Thiazide-Like Diuretics:
- What should be monitored during diuresis?
- Electrolytes, particularly hypokalemia
- More common with augmentation
- Hypokalemia is an independent risk factor for
- Add potassium-sparing diuretics early!
- Long-term benefit
- Add potassium-sparing diuretics early!
- Volume Depletion
- Electrolytes, particularly hypokalemia
- What about ultrafiltration (UF)?
- CARRESS-HF Trial
-
- Preserved renal function
- Lower rates of adverse events
- Criticisms:
- May not be realistic (diuresis was not attempted in UF group)
- Unclear if ideal rate of UF was used
-
- In practice: UF only after a failing maximal medical therapy
- Due to concerns about future renal function when starting HD and dialysis access complications
- CARRESS-HF Trial
- Sequential nephron blockade!
Pearl 5: Don’t be afraid of medical therapy because of CKD
- Guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) for heart failure
- Also are !.
- Benefit of medications seen in patients with:
- Proteinuric CKD (estimated albuminuria > 300 mg/day) with or without diabetes
- GDMT meds are
- Despite worse outcomes!
- Percent of patients of GDMT (RAAS inhibition, MRA, beta blocker) by eGFR at discharge
- → only 5% of patients!
- NOTE: Data from 2014-2019 heart failure registry
- Before SGLT2 inhibitors became an established pillar in heart failure and CKD
- Percent of patients of GDMT (RAAS inhibition, MRA, beta blocker) by eGFR at discharge
- Despite worse outcomes!
- Benefit of medications seen in patients with:
- Also are !.
- How should you start GDMT in advanced CKD?
- Expect an initial decline in eGFR based on creatinine
- When starting RAAS inhibitors and/or SGLT2 inhibitors
- But don’t panic!
- When starting RAAS inhibitors and/or SGLT2 inhibitors
- Decline is usually reflective of:
- Reduction of pathologic hyperfiltration
- Decline is associated with:
-
- SGLT2i studies
-
- General Advice: after initiation as declines in eGFR larger than 30% are unusual with these agents!
- Expect an initial decline in eGFR based on creatinine
- RAAS Inhibitors
- Tips & Tricks
- RAAS inhibitors should NOT be stopped solely because of declining eGFR
- STOP-ACE Trial - when stopping vs. continuing RAS inhibitors at eGFR < 30
- , however, when these agents are stopped.
- STOP-ACE Trial - when stopping vs. continuing RAS inhibitors at eGFR < 30
- Hyperkalemia IS more of a reason to pause - but consider trying to treat the potassium first!
- SGLT2 inhibitors are also protective against hyperkalemia - even more reason to have them on board if not already!
- Consider adding potassium binders (see our episode on ).
- RAAS inhibitors should NOT be stopped solely because of declining eGFR
- Tips & Tricks
- SGLT2 Inhibitors
- Tips & Tricks
- Currently approved for
- EMPA-CKD Trial
- Subgroup analyses of DAPA-CKD Trial
- There are ongoing trials where people are being safely continued on these agents even through dialysis!
- Currently approved for
- Tips & Tricks
- SGLT2 inhibitors can likely be continued safely even if eGFR eventually declines to < 20!
- Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists (MRA)
- Tips & Tricks
- All MRAs:
-
- atients with type 2 diabetes
- Patients with proteinuric CKD
- Improved cardiovascular outcomes and mortality
-
- NOTE:It is still and kidney function especially when initiating any MRA!
- Finerenone:
- New agent on the block!
- Non-steroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist
- More selective for the mineralocorticoid receptor
- Compared to more familiar agents like spironolactone or eplerenone (which are steroidal MRAs)
-
- Compared with nonstero
- More selective for the mineralocorticoid receptor
- All MRAs:
- Tips & Tricks
- Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists (MRA)
Contributors
Shreya Trivedi, MD, ACP Member – Host, Editor
Andrew Ling, MD – Host, Editor, MOC questions
Nayan Arora, MD* - Guest
Nicole Bhave, MD *- Guest
Reviewers
Nisha Bansal, MD, FACP
Larissa Kruger Gomes, MD
* Nayan Arora, MD: AstraZeneca, Bayer – Consultant
* Nicole Bhave, MD: Rednvia - Consultant
Those named above, unless otherwise indicated, have no relevant financial relationships to disclose with ineligible companies whose primary business is producing, marketing, selling, re-selling, or distributing healthcare products used by or on patients. All relevant relationships have been mitigated.
Release Date: May 13, 2024
Expiration Date: May 12, 2027
CME Credit
This activity has been planned and implemented in accordance with the accreditation requirements and policies of the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME) through the joint providership of the »ĆąĎµÎµÎapp and Core IM. The »ĆąĎµÎµÎapp is accredited by the ACCME to provide continuing medical education for physicians.
The »ĆąĎµÎµÎapp designates this enduring material (podcast) for .5 AMA PRA Category 1 Credit™. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity.
ABIM Maintenance of Certification (MOC) Points
Successful completion of this CME activity, which includes participation in the evaluation component, enables the participant to earn up to .5 medical knowledge MOC Point in the American Board of Internal Medicine’s (ABIM) Maintenance of Certification (MOC) program. Participants will earn MOC points equivalent to the amount of CME credits claimed for the activity. It is the CME activity provider’s responsibility to submit participant completion information to ACCME for the purpose of granting ABIM MOC credit.
How to Claim CME Credit and MOC Points
After listening to the podcast, complete a brief multiple-choice question quiz. To claim CME credit and MOC points you must achieve a minimum passing score of 66%. You may take the quiz multiple times to achieve a passing score.